Aptitude · Problems on Ages · Model 6
Find the one hard number, then climb the ladder
Model 6 is a paragraph linking three, four or five people. It looks unmanageable and it is the least mathematical model in the chapter: every sentence is one link, exactly one sentence carries a real number, and the rest is substitution in order.
Decode a four-person paragraph one sentence at a time →01 The idea
The gadget shop, and why the paragraph is not the problem
The Apple AirPods cost ₹2,000 more than the Sony earbuds. The Sony earbuds cost three times as much as the boAt Airdopes. The boAt Airdopes cost ₹1,500. Nobody finds that hard. You write Apple = Sony + 2000, then Sony = 3 × boAt, then spot that boAt has a real price attached — so Sony is ₹4,500 and Apple is ₹6,500.
Model 6 age questions are that shopping trip with names instead of brands. "In 10 years P will be 50. P is twice as old as Q. Q is 5 years older than R. R is half the age of S." Four people, three comparisons and one hard number. The hard number is the anchor, and the answer is three substitutions away.
What makes these questions feel hard is reading them as one object. A paragraph with four names in it does not fit in your head, so you try to hold it there and lose track. The fix is mechanical: take one sentence, write the equation it gives you, and refuse to look ahead. Three short lines on paper beat one long sentence in your head.
This lesson uses P 40, Q 20, R 15 and S 30 throughout. Those four also happen to add up to 105, which matters, because sometimes the paragraph gives you no hard number at all — only a total. Then the anchor is the sum, and the first move is to write everybody in terms of one person before using it.
02 Worked example
Four people, three substitutions
In 10 years P will be 50. P is twice as old as Q. Q is 5 years older than R. R is half the age of S. Find S's age. Take the sentences strictly in order, and notice that you never write two equations on the same line.
The total of those four ages is 105. That matters, because a common variant gives you no hard number at all and instead says "the four ages add up to 105". Then write Q, R and S in terms of P — here Q = P/2, R = P/2 − 5, S = P − 10 — add them to get 3P − 15 = 105, and P is 40 again. Same chain, different anchor.
03 The method
The chain decoder, checked on all four ages
Every row is a sentence that could appear in this question, with the equation it produces and a check against P 40, Q 20, R 15, S 30. Note rows 2 and 3, and 4 and 5: different words, identical link.
| Sentence | The link | Check on P 40, Q 20, R 15, S 30 |
|---|---|---|
| In 10 years P will be 50 | P + 10 = 50 | P = 40 ✓ |
| P is twice as old as Q | P = 2Q | 40 = 2 × 20 ✓ |
| P is 20 years older than Q | P = Q + 20 | same link, different words |
| Q is 5 years older than R | Q = R + 5 | 20 = 15 + 5 ✓ |
| Q is 4/3 times as old as R | 3Q = 4R | 60 = 60 ✓ — same link again |
| R is half the age of S | S = 2R | 30 = 2 × 15 ✓ |
| The four ages add up to 105 | P + Q + R + S = 105 | 40 + 20 + 15 + 30 = 105 ✓ |
| Reading the whole paragraph before writing | guarantees a lost link | four sentences, four lines, in order |
05 Cheat sheet
Model 6 on one page
Five habits and two traps. None of it is mathematics; all of it is bookkeeping, which is exactly why it is worth writing down.
| Situation | What to do | On P 40, Q 20, R 15, S 30 |
|---|---|---|
| A paragraph with three or more names | one sentence, one equation, in order | P = 2Q, Q = R + 5, R = S/2 |
| One sentence has a real number | that is the anchor — start there | P + 10 = 50 → P = 40 |
| No person has a real number, but a total is given | write everyone in terms of one person | 3P − 15 = 105 → P = 40 |
| The chain closes back on itself | substitute all the way round | grandfather = 5(grandfather − 48) |
| Two links multiply instead of adding | expect a quadratic | discard the negative root |
| A group appears on one side | a sum of k people gains kt years | two children gain 40 in 20 years |
| Solving two links simultaneously | never necessary here | substitute one at a time |
06 Where & why
Where the long chain shows up
Model 6 is the standard way to make an easy question expensive. The arithmetic is the lightest in the chapter and the time cost is the highest.
The house style, usually with the anchor buried in the last sentence so that a candidate reading top-down builds the chain backwards. Scanning for the number first is worth about thirty seconds per question.
"P is one-third of Q, Q is 5 years older than R, R is half of S, and the four total 50." One extra step — express everyone in P — and it is the same problem.
A loop leaves one equation in one unknown; a product link leaves a quadratic with one positive root. Both look alarming and both collapse in two lines.
A chain of links is never sufficient without an anchor, and an anchor is never sufficient without the links. That pairing is nearly the whole design of ages sufficiency questions.
07 Interview questions
The chain questions interviewers ask
Ten in escalating order — the method, the anchorless variant, the loop, the quadratic, and the honest question about whether long questions are worth attempting.
How do you approach a paragraph with four people in it?
What exactly is the anchor?
What if no sentence gives an actual age?
Whom do you choose as the base person when there is no anchor?
"P is twice as old as Q." Which one is older?
A chain closes back on itself with no anchor anywhere. What then?
What happens if a link is a product rather than a sum?
A chain has "the sum of his two children's ages" on one side. Anything different?
Compare Model 6 with Model 1.
Should you attempt a long Model 6 question in a timed section?
08 Practice problems
Six chains
For each one, write the links before you write a number, then circle the anchor. Two of these have no anchor in the ordinary sense, and the hard one has no linear solution.