Aptitude · Compound Interest
The base moves, and that changes everything
Simple interest charges the same principal every year. Compound interest adds each year’s interest to the principal first, so the next year is charged on a larger sum. One sentence of difference, and it turns a straight line into a curve.
Set the terms and walk the balance year by year →01 The idea
Interest on interest
Put ₹1000 at 10% a year. After one year you have ₹1100 — and simple and compound interest agree exactly, because there is no earlier interest for anything to compound on yet.
Year two is where they part. Simple interest charges 10% of the original ₹1000 again, another ₹100. Compound interest charges 10% of the ₹1100 now standing, which is ₹110. So the balance goes to ₹1210 rather than ₹1200.
Year three widens it again: 10% of ₹1210 is ₹121, taking the balance to ₹1331 against simple interest’s ₹1300. The yearly interests run 100, 110, 121 — each one bigger than the last, because the sum being charged keeps growing.
Repeating the same multiplication is a power, which is where the formula comes from. Each year multiplies the balance by 1.1, so after T years it is 1000 × 1.1T. Write the multiplier as (1 + R/100) and you have the standard form.
02 Worked example
₹1000 at 10% for 2 years, worked both ways
This sum runs through the whole module. Find the compound interest on ₹1000 at 10% per annum for 2 years, compounded annually.
The ₹10 is exactly 10% of the ₹100 of first-year interest — the interest earned by the interest. That is what “compound” names, and it is the quantity the whole chapter is about. Extend to three years and the gap grows to ₹31, because now there is interest on interest on interest.
03 The method
The formula, and the four compounding periods
One formula, and one adjustment that covers every compounding frequency you will be asked about.
| Compounded | Rate per period | Periods | Formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annually | R | T | P(1+R/100)^T |
| Half-yearly | R/2 | 2T | P(1+R/200)^2T |
| Quarterly | R/4 | 4T | P(1+R/400)^4T |
| Monthly | R/12 | 12T | P(1+R/1200)^12T |
| Any frequency k | R/k | kT | P(1+R/100k)^kT |
| CI directly | no such formula | — | A − P |
05 Cheat sheet
Compound interest on one page
The formulas, and the two facts about them that get asked as questions in their own right.
| Case | Formula | On ₹1,000 at 10% |
|---|---|---|
| Amount, annual | P(1+R/100)^T | 2 yr → 1,210 |
| Compound interest | A − P | 1,210 − 1,000 = 210 |
| Half-yearly | P(1+R/200)^2T | 2 yr → 1,215.51 |
| Quarterly | P(1+R/400)^4T | 2 yr → 1,218.40 |
| First period | same as simple interest | both give 100 |
| CI vs SI | CI > SI for T > 1 | 210 vs 200 |
| Averaging the balances | never | growth is a power |
06 Where & why
Where this shows up
Compound interest is the model behind almost every real financial product, which is why it carries more marks than simple interest.
Usually with rates chosen so the powers stay tidy — 10% gives 1.21 and 1.331, which is why those numbers recur.
“Half-yearly instead of annually — find the difference.” One formula with the rate halved and the periods doubled.
Every one of these compounds. Simple interest is largely a teaching model; this is the one that describes what banks actually do.
Growth at R% a year is the identical power; depreciation is P(1 − R/100)T.
07 Interview questions
What gets asked
Ten, from the definition through to the comparison interviewers use to check you actually understand compounding.
Define compound interest.
Why is there no direct formula for CI the way there is for SI?
Find the compound interest on ₹1000 at 10% for 2 years.
Do simple and compound interest ever agree?
Why does compound interest grow faster and faster?
How do you handle half-yearly compounding?
Why does more frequent compounding give a bigger amount?
What is the quarterly formula?
₹2000 at 20% for 4 years, compounded annually. Find the amount and the CI.
Which is used in the real world, simple or compound interest?
08 Practice problems
Six on the moving base
Work the first two year by year rather than by formula — the point is to see the base move before you start trusting a power.