Aptitude · Ratio and Proportion · Model 4
The rule you cannot break is the model you get paid for
Adding a fixed amount to both terms of a ratio changes it. That is the one thing you may not do to a ratio — and it is exactly why a paper can tell you the ratio before and after a change and expect you to recover the actual numbers.
Set a ratio, a shift and a target, and solve for one part →01 The idea
Why a broken rule is useful
Lesson one said you may multiply or divide both terms of a ratio by the same number but never add to them. That was not a prohibition — it was a measurement. Adding to both terms moves a ratio by a definite amount, and if you know where it started and where it ended, the size of the move tells you the actual quantities.
A class has boys and girls in the ratio 5 : 7. Nine of each leave, and the ratio becomes 7 : 11. You were never told how many students there were, and you do not need to be. Call one part x, so there are 5x boys and 7x girls. After the change there are 5x − 9 and 7x − 9, and those are in the ratio 7 : 11. Cross-multiply, solve, and x = 6 — so 30 boys and 42 girls.
The equation is always linear. Cross-multiplying (5x − 9)/(7x − 9) = 7/11 gives 55x − 99 = 49x − 63, and the x terms sit on both sides at the first power. There is no quadratic to worry about, so every question in this model comes down to one collection of like terms and one division.
Here is the part worth carrying away. When both groups move by the same amount, the difference between them is untouched — 42 − 30 = 12 before, and 33 − 21 = 12 after — while the ratio moves. Scaling does the reverse: it keeps the ratio and changes the difference. Ratios and differences are two independent facts about a pair of numbers, and the two operations each preserve exactly one of them.
02 Worked example
5 : 7 becomes 7 : 11 when nine leave each group
One class runs the whole lesson. In a classroom the boys and girls are in the ratio 5 : 7. If 9 students are removed from each group, the ratio becomes 7 : 11. Find the difference between the number of boys and the number of girls.
The difference of 12 is worth staring at. Before the change it was 42 − 30; after the change it was 33 − 21; both are 12, because subtracting the same 9 from both numbers cannot alter the gap between them. That is the mirror image of the golden rule, and it is also a free check: in any equal-shift question, the difference before and after must match.
03 The method
The general equation, and the shortcut that avoids it
One setup covers every question in this model. The shortcut covers the subset where every term shifts by the same number of parts, and that subset is set surprisingly often.
| Question shape | Setup | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| Ratio 5 : 7, minus 9 each, becomes 7 : 11 | (5x−9)/(7x−9) = 7/11 | x = 6 → 30 and 42 |
| Ratio 3 : 5, minus 9 each, becomes 12 : 23 | (3x−9)/(5x−9) = 12/23 | x = 11 → 33 and 55 |
| Ratio 5 : 3, −50 and +50, becomes 9 : 7 | (5x−50)/(3x+50) = 9/7 | x = 100 → 500 and 300 |
| Ratio 4 : 5, −10 and +10, becomes 1 : 2 | (4x−10)/(5x+10) = 1/2 | x = 10 → total 90 |
| Ratio 1 : 2, plus 7 each, becomes 3 : 5 | (x+7)/(2x+7) = 3/5 | x = 14 → 14 and 28 |
| Ratio 2 : 3 : 5, plus 40 each, becomes 4 : 5 : 7 | every term up 2 parts | 2 parts = 40 → total 200 |
| Total given as well as the ratio | no x needed at all | 504 in 13 : 11 → 273 and 231 |
05 Cheat sheet
Model 4 on one page
The setup, the shortcut, and the two checks that between them catch every error this model can produce.
| Case | Rule | On 5 : 7 → 7 : 11, −9 each |
|---|---|---|
| No total given | write ax and bx | 5x and 7x |
| The equation | (ax+p)/(bx+q) = c/d | (5x−9)/(7x−9) = 7/11 |
| Solving | x = (cq − dp)/(ad − cb) | 36/6 = 6 |
| Equal shifts | the difference is preserved | 12 before, 12 after |
| Unequal shifts | gap changes by |q − p| | −50 and +50 moves it by 100 |
| Every term up the same parts | skip the algebra | 2:3:5 → 4:5:7 is +2 parts each |
| Total given as well | no x at all | 504 in 13:11 gives 273 and 231 directly |
06 Where & why
Where this shows up
Model 4 is the most algebraic model in the chapter, which is why it is the one that separates candidates in a hard paper.
The standard form, with the total deliberately withheld so you have to introduce x. Two or three marks and about ninety seconds.
“50 boys leave and 50 girls join.” Same equation, but the signs differ between the two groups, and a sign slip produces a plausible wrong answer rather than an obvious one.
Check whether every term rises by the same number of parts. When it does — 2 : 3 : 5 to 4 : 5 : 7 — the whole question is one division.
“The ratio becomes 2 : 1 when 15 girls leave; then 1 : 5 when 45 boys also leave.” Two equations in two unknowns, solved by substitution. This is the hardest shape the chapter has.
07 Interview questions
What gets asked
Ten. The second question is the one that explains why this model exists at all.
Boys and girls are in the ratio 5 : 7. Nine leave each group and the ratio becomes 7 : 11. Find the difference between the two numbers.
Adding to both terms is the one thing you cannot do to a ratio. So why is there a whole model about it?
Does subtracting the same number from both quantities change their difference?
Why does the equation never come out quadratic?
Three classes are in the ratio 2 : 3 : 5. Forty students join each and the ratio becomes 4 : 5 : 7. Find the original total.
When can you skip introducing x altogether?
A ratio 5 : 3 becomes 9 : 7 when 50 boys leave and 50 girls join. Find the number of boys.
What number must be added to both terms of 7 : 13 to make it 2 : 3?
What is the fastest check on an answer in this model?
Which shape of this model is genuinely hard?
08 Practice problems
Six on the shifting ratio
Read each one for whether the total is given before you write anything. Two of the six give it to you, and introducing x in those is wasted effort.