Aptitude · Profit, Loss and Discount · Reverse models
Running the discount backwards, and the models built on it
The harder half of the discount chapter is everything that runs the process in reverse: an unknown second discount, a marked price expressed in terms of the cost, a profit hidden behind a markup and a discount. All of it is one division you have to be willing to do.
Give two prices and one discount, and recover the other →01 The idea
Every reverse question is a division
An article marked at ₹15,000 sells for ₹8,400 after two successive discounts, the first being 30%. What was the second? The instinct is to work in rupees: the total discount is ₹6,600, the first took ₹4,500, so the second took ₹2,100 — and then to call that 14% of ₹15,000. That is wrong.
The second discount is a percentage of the price the first one left, not of the marked price. After 30% off, the price is ₹10,500. The final price of ₹8,400 divided by ₹10,500 is 0.8, so 80% survived and the second discount was 20%. One division, and the base is correct by construction.
That single move — divide the price you ended at by the price you started that step from — unlocks the whole of this lesson. It finds an unknown discount, an unknown markup, or an unknown tax, because in each case the multiplier is exactly the ratio of the two prices.
The other family here is algebraic rather than arithmetic. “The marked price is ₹150 less than three times the cost price, and a 20% discount gives a selling price of ₹1,800.” Nothing to divide yet — you write the marked price in terms of the cost, apply the discount multiplier, set it equal to the selling price and solve. Same discipline about bases, one unknown instead of a ratio.
02 Worked example
₹15,000 down to ₹8,400, first discount 30%
The source question, and the model for every reverse discount. The marked price of an article is ₹15,000. After two successive discounts it sold for ₹8,400. If the first discount was 30%, find the second.
The check in the last step is worth building in permanently. Compute the overall discount straight from the first and last prices, then confirm your two individual discounts combine to it via a + b − ab/100. It costs one division and it catches the wrong-base error immediately — here the incorrect 14% would combine with 30% to give 39.8%, not 44%.
03 The method
The five reverse models, and what each one needs
All of these are set regularly. The first three are divisions; the last two are one-line algebra.
| Model | What you are given | Route |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown second discount | MP, SP, first discount | 1 − SP/(MP×(1−d₁)) |
| Overall discount | MP and SP | 1 − SP/MP |
| Markup from a discount and profit | discount%, profit% | (100+p)/(100−d) − 1 |
| MP in terms of CP | an expression plus discount and SP | one equation in CP |
| Discount and profit amount | MP, discount%, profit in rupees | CP = SP − profit |
| Extra expense | purchase, expense, MP, discount | CP = purchase + expense |
| Rupees off the marked price | wrong for a 2nd discount | gives 14%, not 20% |
05 Cheat sheet
Reverse models on one page
Three divisions and three algebraic set-ups. The last row is the error the whole lesson is about.
| Want | Route | Worked |
|---|---|---|
| Second discount | 1 − SP/intermediate | 1 − 8400/10500 = 20% |
| Overall discount | 1 − SP/MP | 1 − 8400/15000 = 44% |
| Check the pair | a + b − ab/100 | 30+20−6 = 44% ✓ |
| Markup for a target profit | (100+p)/(100−d) | 120/80 = 1.5 → 50% |
| CP from MP, discount, profit₹ | CP = SP − profit | 1600×0.65 − 250 = 790 |
| MP given in terms of CP | one equation in CP | 0.8(3c−150)=1800 → 800 |
| Rupees off the marked price | wrong base | gives 14% |
06 Where & why
Where these show up
This is the mains-paper end of the discount chapter, and the 16 models in the source material are almost all variations on the reverse move.
The single most set reverse question. The wrong answer from working in rupees off the marked price is always among the options.
“What markup allows a 20% discount and 20% profit?” One division of the two multipliers gives 1.5, so 50%.
Algebraic rather than arithmetic. One equation in CP, solved once, avoids the intermediate figures where errors creep in.
Easier than it looks: apply the discount to get SP, then CP is simply SP minus the stated profit.
07 Interview questions
What gets asked
Ten, drawn from the harder models in the source material.
₹15,000 sells for ₹8,400 after two discounts, the first 30%. Find the second.
Why is 14% wrong there?
How do you check a reverse-discount answer?
The marked price of an article is ₹1,600. After a 35% discount the dealer makes ₹250 profit. Find the cost price.
The marked price is ₹150 less than three times the cost, and a 20% discount gives a selling price of ₹1,800. Find the cost price.
A stone costing ₹4,200 has ₹1,600 spent on it and is advertised at ₹9,000 with a 20% discount. Find the profit percentage.
What markup allows a 20% discount and still gives a 20% profit?
An article marked ₹10,000 sells at successive discounts of 13% and 20%. Find the price.
Two successive discounts of 12% and 25% — what is the overall discount?
What is the single habit that gets all of these right?
08 Practice problems
Six reverse models
Drawn from the harder models in the source material. In each, name the base of the missing percentage before you calculate.